Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy punk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 04:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Candy punk

Candy punk (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No non-spelling related edits since close of previous VfD in June 2005. Only supporting Ext. Link has since gone bad. No relevent GHits noted. Possible hoax? its not turned out to be an actual genre. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 11:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, not viable. Punkmorten 13:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unsourced nonsense, but redirect to pop punk. The term exists in reliable sources, used for bands incl. Green Day, Allister, Sum 41, Blink 182, etc. Does not seem to be addefinable genre, though. --Dhartung | Talk 13:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Only one example, and it's a redlink. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 15:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Unverifiable, non-notable neologism. I also wouldn't object to a redirect per Dhartung.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above and do not redirect. RFerreira 08:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable genre, probably coined by the only band listed. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.