Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cananga-an

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, with no prejudice against creating redirect to Cabanglasan. Consensus is clear that this article does not meet inclusion guidelines. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cananga-an

Cananga-an (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This cites no sources because it is original research - the report of someone's project. PROD removed by originator without comment. JohnCD (talk) 12:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete reads like outline for travel log. no sources, WP:OR as par nomination.Coffeepusher (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment created with the tagline "This is the pre output of the research not the whole text" == INTRODUCTION == This art..." so I read that as self professed WP:ORCoffeepusher (talk) 20:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to Cabanglasan, its municipality. Much of it may be technically OR, but there is no doubt that the place exists. Despite reading the comments at Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines/Archive03#Barangays_again which gives some interesting comparative information about the size of Philippines barangays, and Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines/Archive15#Barangay_notability which discusses some other recent barangay AfDs, I'm not convinced that this is notable enough for its own article.  —SMALLJIM  21:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.