Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camspotting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Camspotting

Totally non-notable per WP:WEB; just one look at the linked forums confirms. Advertising for a service/game that frankly isn't even up yet, apparently. (|-- UlTiMuS 12:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• delete, maybe even speedy... yandman 12:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Speedy would probably apply, as it doesn't assert notability. Natalie 12:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per the website: "We have 1 registered user." They (quite literally) don't get any less notable than that. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, pretty much self-admitted neologism/vanity article. JIP | Talk 15:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — as per nom. JoeSmack ^Talk(p-review!) 21:09, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Anomo 07:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• I have removed my name and the link to the non-developed forums. Can 'JoeSmack' and 'Anomo' please give a reason for a deletion request? --Gizmoguy 12:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.