Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Pathfinder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Don't know if this should affect the merge discussion; if there is consensus on that, it wasn't clear here. Luna Santin 06:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Camp Pathfinder

A non-notable summer camp. Delete exolon 19:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep A camp been running almost 100 years seems notable. And like schools, real places with real history seem more encyclopedic than e.g. internet chat rooms.Obina 19:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no evidence of notability.--Peta 06:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete It's been around for a century and gets 531 hits on google (which is pretty good for a rural Canadian summer camp), but it doesn't have an alexa ranking and, according to the site, only takes in 110 boys a year. It's already been mentioned in the Algonquin Provincial Park page, perhaps a full merger would be best. Ultra-Loser ^{Talk Comparison of BitTorrent sites} 06:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Verifiable, NPOV. See Wikipedia:Non-notability. arj 19:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I think it is notable per Obina and agree with the merge idea. Also, there are articles for swarms of tiny "census-designated places."Yes I created the article, you can siscount this or whatever, but I still think it's a keep.Grand Slam 7 22:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Referenced by a non-trivial publication. Batmanand | Talk 10:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.