Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Crooked Creek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete due to lack of reliable sources. — TKD::Talk 01:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Camp Crooked Creek

Camp_Crooked_Creek (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

This inforamtion was used without the consent of the appropriate people. It misrepresents the camp, the LHC, and the BSA. Some of the information has been dubbed secret and taken from the Staff Manual. Safety and Security can be compromised with the article. As well as posing a danger to the safety and therefore the integrity of the camp, it also has many many falsehoods in it. Plese delete this article ASAP. Thanks!

  • Delete - Consent of appropriate people is not needed for any Wikiepdia article. I do not see any where that the article misrepresents any of the groups you listed.(If found they should be corrected not deleted). Any thing from there staff maunle that was copied word for word should be removed or paraphrased. I don't see any thing at a quick glance. Any falsehoods should be corrected not deleted. I see none. As for safety and security, I also see nothing that could put anyone in any danger. Keep in mind my opinion my be some what coi because I am an Eagle Scout, three year camper of this camp, and and four year staff member of this camp. I have tried to keep my edits to the page to non content related. To avoid breaking the WP rules about COI. The page needs work(as does most wikiepida articles) but the page meets all requirements(at least as far as I can see) to be included in Wikiepida.R00m c 04:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I changed my mind and my stand on this. As stated in other comments below the topic is not notable. One sign of this is their are no third party publications about this topic. Only original research and what the LHC put up on the website.R00m c 02:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I'm confused. This is a poorly written article full of pamphleteering, but I don't see any security issues here. The camp may deserve an article, but if so, I suggest that it should be in a truncated form. Colonel Tom 13:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, not because it gives away the secrets of the Illuminati and Area 51 (or whatever) but because it doesn't really assert notability. A children's camp would have to be pretty notable to warrant an article on its own, and I see nothing in either the article or the official website that suggests this is any exception. I'm not seeing any reliable sources either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, per Col. Tom & Starblind. Notability neither asserted nor present. Accounting4Taste 21:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.