Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Arowhon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Camp Arowhon

Camp Arowhon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable summer camp. Is fairly old, but does not appear to be covered in reliable sources that would enable a decent, NPOV article to be written. (See [1] and [2]. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 00:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Its a summer camp. Kids go here to use summer camp facilities and do summer camp things. Unless information taken from reliable sources independant of the camp, its members/participants, or its supporting organisation(s) can be provided to show that this facility is far above and beyond all other summer camps per a series of WP:Notable incidents or events, it should be deleted. -- saberwyn 02:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • KEEP Wikipedia should be inclusive not exclusive. The larger Wikipedia is the best of a resource it is. One million articles is much better that one hundred thousand articles. It should be a source of information on the most trivial matters to the most important. Callelinea 04:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment That's a nice opinion, but do you have an argument based in Wikipedia policies and guidelines? --Dhartung | Talk 08:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Pasting a comment from one debate to another indicates a lack of objective assessment against the inclusion criteria. Adrian M. H. 20:26, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per ObiterDicta. Subject fails WP:N. --Dhartung | Talk 08:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:N. A quick search showed the official website and a handful of trivial advertorial entries on related sites, and nothing of much use per WP:V. Adrian M. H. 20:26, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable, small camp. Even the assertion of notability of alumni fails, with all those red links. Bearian 18:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.