Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron McKay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was The result of the discussion was to delete the article. Croat Canuck 02:25, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cameron McKay

Delete. Looks like a nn bio to me, probably created by Cameron McKay. A search for his company gets less than 150 hits and even a search for the somewhat common name gets under 1000. Mrtea (talk) 03:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Seems to be vanity; fails WP:BIO. --Kinu 03:33, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kinu Ruby 03:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Actually google with with nurv technologies in quotes returns only 10 distinct hits and with name of article subject, gets 0 hits. No assertion of notability in article. --Fuhghettaboutit 03:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Avi 04:03, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this embarassing nn VanityCruft. And Cam, black isn't as slimming as you might think ++Deiz 04:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, VanityCruft. Royboycrashfan 04:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Bio of a CEO whose company has just opened its first office. Capitalistroadster 04:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as extreme vanity.Blnguyen 05:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The article is not about the subject, rather it is about the subject's non-notable company. This violates WP:BIO with a failure to assert notability.  (aeropagitica)  06:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity, but be nice! Body image comments are probably superfluous. -- Samir |Talk ∙ Contribs | 07:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: needs a new staff photographer. Adrian Lamo ·· 08:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity, non-notable. Camillus (talk) 10:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity sk 21:04, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ardenn 21:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Wow, a nice gesture on part of my employees turns bad. FYI, We are a new company, but have serious dollars invested in our group. I think its good, as it is a dictionary and if you want to learn more about me its available. I'll hold off on having our company put up on here since the attitude is not what I expected. burlingtondude 04:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Dogbreathcanada 02:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me}15:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.