Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Jerome

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mackensen (talk) 23:13, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cameron Jerome

Certainly not npov, despite true. Doesnt merit article, at least unless someone adds vaguely decent content. UkPaolo 21:03, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn Kel-nage 21:06, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, plays for Cardiff City. Kappa 21:14, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• comment: yes, the article is true (as I said above), and I see that you have wikified it for a npov. I'm still not convinced this person needs a unique article, however, since he is listed on the Cardiff City page. Why does Cameron Jerome require a seperate article, and yet barely any of the other players do? He's no more notable than the others, and the article provides no further info. I'll be interested to see the overall consensus on this point, however. UkPaolo 21:31, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep We could expand if it has little content. "Jerome is one of Cardiff's rising stars" - BBC --Chill Pill Bill 01:49, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as it stands. If there is something significant to say then let it be added to the article. Vegaswikian 05:27, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• keep this too please Yuckfoo 16:16, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 09:21, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete There's a new link, just appeared, to him from the Huddersfield article, I've lived in Huddersfield for 52 years and never heard of him.Richard Harvey 18:37, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.