Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge, Minnesota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Close. No need to waste time on this. —Xezbeth 11:39, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cambridge, Minnesota

Cambridge, Minnesota (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable town with only 5520 people, no notable history Sploooshman 08:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Real town. Towns and villages are precisely the kind of things which encyclopedias cover. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

While cities and large towns are notable and deserving to be recognised in a comprehensive encyclopedia, smaller townships and villages with no historical, cultural, social or other significance are not. As this town has no past or present achievements or any form of notoriety it does not pass notability guidelines and until it reaches these its deletion is justified Sploooshman 09:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. Although not a guideline or policy, consensus has been in the past that cities, villages, and towns are all sufficiently notable. --Dhartung | Talk 10:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Consensus is that all communities are notable, no exception. --Charlene 10:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.