Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camarojuana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as hoax. Daniel Case 19:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Camarojuana

Camarojuana (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Strange article about non-notable band Abu badali (talk) 21:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete Obvious hoax. I will tag it for immediate removal. --Daniel J. Leivick 21:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom.--JForget 22:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Hoax. This is a very bad prank. H irohisatTalk Page 22:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete This isn't even covert vandalism, it's blatant vandalism. Calgary 23:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC) Research and Possible Massive Rewrite Okay, the article may be one of the worst written that I've ever seen, and may have been written by a user with the same name, but it doesn't seem to be a hoax of any sort. A bit of googling turns up a good deal of relevant results. Now, considering this, I think the discussion from this point forth should pertain to whether or not the band is notable. If we determine that it is, the article is going to need a complete overhaul, because it's currently, for lack of a better word, crap. Calgary 23:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • delete - do seem to be a real band (have a few google mentions) but non-noteable.Merkinsmum 23:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • weak keep After a cursory search it does appear to be authentic, and barely pass notability, but it needs to be completely rewritten and well cited - superβεεcat  23:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as a hoax. Yes, there are Google hits, but not one of them demonstrates that this information is not complete bollocks. Primary source of information seems to be a MySpace page. Also, a big chunk of the article appears to be a copyvio of a press release that appeared here. Heather 03:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete obvious hoax, on so many scores, seems like WP:BOLLOCKS. Carlossuarez46 17:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.