Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvin Giles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 04:40Z
[edit] Calvin Giles
- Keep Holding a public office is a reason for notability, it is just unfortunate his article has not been filled in better. Research time! --Ozgod 19:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, I find no secondary sources available whatsoever, and none are cited. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 09:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cbrown1023 talk 01:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I added some references from the Illinois legislature itself. --Eastmain 02:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Except for the Tribune (which is a name-drop), those are all primary sources. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 04:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Nominated by an anon user (as their first, and only, edit) with no deletion rationale provided. Resolute 06:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per sources added. Primary sources are acceptable as long as they "only make descriptive claims". All of the information in the article is currenlty description. Also, is it just me or is no reason for deletion given? -- Black Falcon 07:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, provided more citations are added from other secondary sources. Smee 10:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC).
- Keep Elected officials at the state/provincial level are notable. --Charlene 12:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Politicians are notable, all current Canadian federal MP's and many ex-MP's have articles. Although, this article would need some serious expansion--JForget 00:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
- Keep. Expansion would be nice, but Wikipedia is better off with this stub than with nothing, so keep it. JamesMLane t c 03:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
