Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calthorpe clinic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John Reaves (talk) 04:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Calthorpe clinic

Calthorpe clinic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article has had notability and orphan tags sitting on it for a month now. Delete unless it's proven that this neighborhood health clinic is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. szyslak (t, c) 20:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Clinic. Herostratus 14:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
This is not a reason for deletion or are you suggesting the Mayo Clinic should go too? Please elaborate. - Mgm|(talk) 11:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, doesn't seem very notable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tim.bounceback (talk • contribs) 00:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete - No assertion of notability, fails WP:N.--Bryson 00:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
The article states it was the first clinic outside London to provide abortions. That is an assertion of notability. - Mgm|(talk) 11:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep if sources can be found. It would appear that "the first abortion provider to open a clinic outside London in 1969." was historically notable.DGG 03:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. A quick look in LexisNexis shows this clinic was the main subject of multiple news articles over the last 4 years. I beleive an indepth investigation from Wikipedia:Newspapers and magazines request service is a good idea before considering deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 11:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Please simply add what you have to the article. DGG 01:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
As soon as I get access to LexisNexis again I will see what I can do. - Mgm|(talk) 08:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

clo