Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Callipygous

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:10, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Callipygous

Dicdef, and seems unlikley to expand much. Delete or Traswiki. DES 20:05, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

• Wiktionary has a sufficient definition. Useful word, but delete. Chatoyant 20:26, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia's official policies state that Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WIN) and such definitions should be sent to Wiktionary. drini ☎ 21:05, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wiktionary. Contents are slightly different.-Poli (talk • contribs) 22:47, 2005 July 25 (UTC)
  • Yes. Wiktionary's are better. Transwiki is, in this case, completely unnecessary and a waste of the time and effort of the various editors who manually perform that task — edits to 6 pages just to give Wiktionary content that is inferior to what it already has. Please find another solution to your problem. Uncle G 23:13:46, 2005-07-25 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef and Wiktionary's entry is already far better than this thing. Xaa 03:06, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.