Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calling Seat Check

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:46, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Calling Seat Check

WP:NEO? The only things I can find on Google are sites that use the word seat and check, but not together; and the only source there is Urban Dictionary. J Ditalk 18:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete We needed an AfD for this? Sigh. Dipics 18:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • There's an article for calling shotgun...if nothing else, you could put this as another one of the American Culture stub articles.--Binoly 19:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The phrase "calling shotgun" gets about 24,000 ghits. This one gets none. Dipics 19:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • One reason for making this article is because there are references to it Calling Fives, and not a lot of actual informaiton. If there is an article for calling fives, cooties, and the five second rule, this article should be equally considered. Members of the military use the term seat check countless times every day. If nothing else, allow it to go to the American Culture section. --Binoly 19:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Del per nom. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 20:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and on the grounds of extreme pointlessness. --Aaron 20:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Aaron. zephyr2k 03:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I think that the article is great. It is kind of the same thing as the fives thing, but if there is room for that, then why shouldn't there be room for this?--R1seagainst 09:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • del per nom. Possibly merge some info into one or more other articles. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.