The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
More NATLFEDcruft. Hardly anything about this group is verifiable from independent sources. Notability and importance not established. Delete. KleenupKrew 22:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete, seems like a long rambling article about a group with questionable if any notability. Stifle (talk) 21:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.