Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Ralph

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Nomination Withdrawn. android79 01:33, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Caleb Ralph

No vote. Wasn't sure if this was an A7 speedy so I brought it here. I know nothing about rugby, so I can't tell if this article asserts notability or even if it's a flat-out hoax. android79 12:29, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Plenty of google hits, and while I don't know much about NZ rugby (as the google hits suggest this is the country Caleb is from/playing in) it does certainly assert notability and he appears to be notable. weak Keep but cleanup. Thryduulf 13:05, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep but cleanup. he's a New Zealand international. Dunc|☺ 14:33, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and cleanup-expand. Notable rugby player as per [1]. Played as an All Black and played in a number of Super 12 championship sides as a member of the Canterbury Crusaders. Capitalistroadster 19:47, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
  • If no one objects, I'll rescind the deletion nomination and slap a cleanup tag on this article, since consensus seems to be forming in that direction. android79 19:54, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep. Please check before making such ridiculous nominations. Grutness...wha? 23:06, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Someone nominated this for speedy deletion. I disagreed, so I brought it here, as described in WP:CSD: If the assertion is disputed or controversial, it should be taken to AFD instead. What's ridiculous about that?! android79 23:16, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
      • Forgive me - I misread your initial comment as being that you had originally considered it a csd but changed your mind. Apologies. In any case, I've tidied the article up a bit now, so hopefully it's a good enough stub now. Grutness...wha? 23:40, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
        • No problem, I guess I wasn't crystal clear with the nomination. In any case, I'll close this one early. android79 01:33, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.