Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caju Industrial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nakon 04:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Caju Industrial

Caju Industrial (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Tagged as fake which is not a CSD: Possibly Probably existing football club whose actual league is unknown / unverified, but it is certainly not the top league as currently indicated in the article. Sources are neither present nor found by me. Tikiwont (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the related article on their nn stadium:

Estádio do Conselho Municipal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Comment It seems that Caju Industrial is the name of a company in Mozambique [1][2], which is/was a parastal fruit and nut growing operation. I tend to view this as a keep and short pending sources operation.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 20:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - Meanwhile, I've found them listed at a (Brazilian ) site at [3] and they might well be a company sponsored soccer club. If somebody can come up with anything substantial, even better. Whether we should have an article on above mentioned company is IMO a different question until there is actual evidence that they're indeed related. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Above is just a listing as existing. The current article isn't correct and there aren't any sources two write something different. So it's still delete for me.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Rewrite about the parastatal, as it seems more notable and verifiable than the football club.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 15:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

With the reference tot he listing, I was m just talking about the football club. There is no need to decide here whether we should have an article on the company nor would it be a good idea to write it on top of the current one, not least to avoid the possibility to revert to the previous topic. If someone sees fit, they can write a stub or article on the parastatal in any case, e.g. at the same place after the current one has been deleted, or at Caju Industrial (company), with a redirect from Caju Industrial, which might avoid misunderstandings. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.