Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caffers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted as nonsense produced out of vanity.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  21:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Caffers

Contested {{nonsense}}. Speedy delete. Weregerbil 18:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom. Mangojuice^talk 18:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Nothing to contest. It's nonsense all right. Fan1967 18:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge content into creator's user page instead, if possible. Otherwise, delete since it's a non-notable vanity page. --Slgrandson 18:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Super Speedy Delete - absolute rubbish, complete and utter nonsense. - Glen ^T_C (Stollery) 18:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete The very definition of CSD7 Gwernol 19:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy and delete- Reyk _YO! 20:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. From the line "I believe i now meet the criteria!" as well as the "dead, famous, etc, etc" remark, it appears the author needed to prove they are notable for some reason or another to someone who said they'd accept "having an article on Wikipedia" as acceptable proof of notability. Still violates WP:VANITY, among others. Lee Bailey 20:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.