Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cables on Demand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cables on Demand

Cables_on_Demand (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

The article is a paraphrase of their 'company profile' page. Looking at the original version of the article, posted by Avneet, a user who is now gone, it is clear that the intent was to post an ad -- the article contained full contact info for ordering, etc.

• Delete. It's been tagged as needing sources since April. --Alvestrand 05:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect A division of Amphenol Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 12:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable company. Keb25 13:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as article about privately held company that does not demonstrate its notability per WP:CORP. --Gavin Collins 13:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, strongly. Redundant to Amphenol, and so POV that no amount of editing could redeem this. They provide cable assembly solutions to consumers. Why would any one want to dissolve their cables? - Smerdis of Tlön 13:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7, company without assertion of notability. shoy 18:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.