Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabej

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cabej

Cabej (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This stub for an Albanian family name has a number of problems. First, the content seems to be original research and no sources are provided to indicate otherwise. It is also clearly meant to be, if not glorifying, then at least very sympathetic to the Çabej family. This could be a reasonable disambiguation page except that there are currently no individual Cabej or Çabej with Wikipedia articles (although it's my understanding that some could have in the future). Finally, the creator of the page recently blanked it for unclear reasons, although probably related to the debate Talk:Cabej on the talk page. Note that I recently redirected the duplicate page Çabej to Eqerem Çabej University. It would be also reasonable to do the same thing in this case. Pascal.Tesson 15:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - not only unsourced and POV, but it doesn't actually cite any specific people within the family when discussing their achievements. Either completely rewrite and source, or delete. Walton Vivat Regina! 16:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
In all fairness though, an earlier version mentioned Eqerem Çabej among the notable Çabej. Pascal.Tesson 16:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Question Delete - Do we know for sure the creator of the page (Canaa kahn) is one of the two IPs (199.97.98.39 & 67.80.177.72) who has blanked the page? --Keesiewonder talk 21:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
That's what the history of the talk page indicates. Canaa kahn signed a message written as 67.80.177.72 a few seconds earlier. The other IP has a history of vandalism and is probably unrelated. Pascal.Tesson 21:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Ah! Thanks. If the creator of the page is now blanking it and the subject as yet appears otherwise non-notable, then ... delete. --Keesiewonder talk 21:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.