Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabbage joke

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:06, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cabbage joke

Seems to be an article on a single joke which I've never heard of before. Is it really that famous? If not, should probably be deleted—we generally have articles on categories of jokes, like knock-knocks, but not on individual ones. Psychonaut 19:15, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• "Knock! Knock!"
  "Who's there?"
  "An 'I can invent a joke like that one!' article."
  Wikipedia is not the Denis The Menace Joke Book. Delete. Uncle G 19:34, 2005 Jan 29 (UTC)
• Delete -- Infrogmation 19:43, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Joke. Riffsyphon1024 21:59, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• I can't see any possible reason why this should be merged into joke. Delete. It doesn't even qualify for BJAODN. RickK 22:22, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Well it certainly doesn't qualify for GJAODN. Delete, this is not a jokebook. -R. fiend 22:40, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Brim 01:39, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable enough, trivial, un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 03:11, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Last I checked, there was a jokebook section in Wikibooks. If anyone is interested, it could be moved there. It is not an encyclopedia article. Rossami (talk) 03:39, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not encyclopaedic... Beta_M ^talk, |^contrib (Ë-Mail)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.