Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSF Lifecycle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CSF Lifecycle
This page appears to be part of someone's failed multilevel marketing campaign from 2005 --Msebast 00:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete ... 200-some google hits, mostly on places derived from Wikipedia BigDT 01:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - it's rubbish. - Richardcavell 01:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not seeing any notability. Aplomado talk 01:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not seeing any either. Give the guy props for his adspam lasting this long, though. RGTraynor 01:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Google for the term with -wikipedia set[1] returns only 32 hits, and most of those are still Wikipedia. This appears to be either original research or, as Msebast suggests, something to do with marketing. --BrownHairedGirl 01:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per BrownHairedGirl User_talk:Dlohcierekim 04:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete randomcrapcruft M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 09:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable, and seems to be original research. Beno1000 12:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as above. ProhibitOnions 12:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This kind of writing makes me physically ill. Smerdis of Tlön 13:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete OR -- Samir
(the scope) धर्म 18:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
