The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete (Would have qualified for WP:CSD#A7). JERRYtalkcontribs 03:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced, non-notable, self-promotion. They try hard, but it remains non-notable Lumberjake (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete - blatant advertising from a company of borderline notability.--Porcupine (prickle me!·contribs·status) 15:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.