Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COGIATI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. Deathphoenix ʕ 16:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] COGIATI

Found whilst stub-sorting. Doesn't give any context, too technical, can't figure out if it's notable or not. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable, may be self-publication. haz _(user talk)^e 17:30, 18 March 2006
• Keep. There are plenty of stubs which have far less information than this one. Later, this article may be expanded to give commentary on the veracity of it which would be very important to questioning persons. 68.161.80.72 19:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. While it's entirely possible that the entry could be expanded by someone willing to give it the time and effort required, I find myself asking if the subject of the article is worth that time. I can't see that it is, especially given the amateur psychology and stereotyping involved in the questions the COGIATI asks.
• Comment. Current entry state not a reason to delete. Amateur Psychology and Stereotyping is opinion. Its well known amoungst the trans community.
• Keep. According to Jennifer Diane Reitz (both the person and the article), professionals frequently use or have used this test. If you dispute its usefulness, I'd call that all the more reason to expand this article. Dan 17:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. I am a transsexual and my therapist did indeed reference this quiz - not the entire thing, but select questions she felt relevant to my treatment. 66.67.227.247 00:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• This nomination was incomplete, listing now. - Liberatore(T) 20:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep. A well known concept, very notable and meets the guidance. I'm surprised its not already listed. Worthy article. --manchesterstudent 21:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, notability is not asserted satisfactorily, it was created by a webcomic author and doesn't seem to have acceptance by experts in the field. -- Kjkolb 22:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep This standard is used often in gender identification tests; in fact, everyone I've taken on the Internet complies with this standard. Plus, the creator of the test made Boppin'. Can't beat that;) Danny Lilithborne 05:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.