Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNNBS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CNNBS

CNNBS (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Insufficient notability of the group itself, even if members might be notable. One member link refers to soccer player, not musician. CobaltBlueTony 14:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

I took link away from member. Band is gaining notoriety, plus is my favourite rnr band. Also, there are no articles with same name. please, leave the article up... I'll keep it updated with info. i'll fix it. Juliette Moore 17:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Keep per asserted notability ('"Rock Band of the Year 2007" prize in Buenos Aires', going on a national tour) provided citations are added to support these claims. I also assume that there are independent reviews of this band, given these claims, so links to them should be added to support it being a notable group. DMacks 17:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete claims made in article are unverified. Not sure if the band would notable anyway. Sasha Callahan 20:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] From the author

I've added some references of gigs and articles related to cnnbs! I really hope this helps! Thank u all :) Juliette Moore 06:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I just need to keep the one in capital letters. I'm new! I didn´t know how to do it. I don't want/need both articles. Thanks for your help Juliette Moore 14:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Can I get that message out please? Juliette Moore 21:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - wikipedia is not a place to get your message out, but rather to report that others have your message. find third party sources for the tour, awards, and such to verify notability as a band and the article will be fine. --Rocksanddirt 21:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

From JulietteThanks for the tip! I've found a couple of third party articles and have referenced them in the article. will continue to look.Juliette Moore 22:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CitiCat ^♫ 03:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable. Most of the sources listed are self-published such as blogs and tripod.com pages. None of them represent actual independent press coverage. --Darkwind (talk) 04:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete As NN. However, is above claim of "rock band of the year" is sourced and added to article, I will be more then happy to change my stance. Turlo Lomon 06:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete without prejudice. They are not notable at this time. Even with one cited source, I would still not change my mind as multiple, reliable, reputable third party notable sources are required per wikipedia policy. Once they make it big, I would be happy to see the article recreated --Brian_{(view my history)}/^{(How am I doing?)} 07:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete (without prejudice) per the above; significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources is not apparent at the moment. EyeSerene^TALK 19:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.