Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNBC - MSN MoneyII

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:14, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] CNBC - MSN MoneyII

Article about a single chat room on MSN Money. We don't even have an article about MSN Money itself. Not encyclopedic. This article was also created as link spam for some emoticon web site. Rhobite 17:34, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete --Anonymous Cow 17:53, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --DDerby 18:01, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• This is not spam. The list of emoticons is used to help users find the emoticons, even if the article is incomplete. The link is not to promote any products or services on the referenced site. It's used to find a complete list of emoticons that can't be found on Microsoft Web sites. And just because there's no MSN Money article, that doesn't mean that the article or articles that link there have to be deleted. Whether it's "encyclopedic" or not is subjective. If you don't like the topic, just don't read the article. Do not delete --User:2005-04-08T13:18Z
• Delete. Chat rooms are not encyclopedic and it does look like spam for the linked emoticon web site. -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:10, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I've removed the spam, but that doesn't make the article's subject any more notable. android↔talk 20:15, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as chat-room-cruft. — JIP | Talk 20:58, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Related website may deserve an article - a short mention of the chat room can be put there. But chat rooms certainly don't deserve their own articles. Delete. Mgm|^(talk) 21:20, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Radiant_* 22:28, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Dsmdgold 02:39, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, cruft. Megan1967 04:33, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per Mgm. VladMV ٭ ^talk 22:04, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.