Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHEAL-Bibliography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:12, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CHEAL-Bibliography

not an encyclopedia article - belongs on wikisource Stbalbach 01:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Articles being nominated for deleting also include: CHEAL-Bibliography/Volume I, CHEAL-Bibliography/Volume I/Chapter 1

• Comment shouldn't the pages linked to by this article be nominated as well? And, I don't know how old this is, but what about copyrights? -- Koffieyahoo 01:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• They are sub-articles so they go without saying (one can't exist without another) but I added them above to clarify. I didn't realize this is from a Copyright work, in which case the whole thing can be quickly copyvio'd .. can we confirm it is a copyvio? -- Stbalbach 02:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, it doesn't go without saying. Anyway, I added the appropriate AfD tags to those pages. -- Koffieyahoo 02:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• This is said to be from The Cambridge History of English and American Literature which is out of copyright. But, the Bibliography contains works from 1992, etc.. something is fishy. --Stbalbach 02:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Didn't find the 1992 entry, anyway no copyvio if a copy of the original. -- Koffieyahoo 02:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• CHEAL-Bibliography/Volume_I/Chapter_1#BEOWULF: Olrik, A. Danmarks Helte-Digtning. Copenhagen, 1993., and Hall, J. R. Clark. Translation. [Good bibliography, includes Finnsburh] 1991. - only those two, maybe they are typos. -- Stbalbach 03:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom. I read the following on Talk:CHEAL-Bibliography: "While assisting with CHEL and CHAL on Wikisource, I thought of adding the bilbiographies as am article here on Wikipedia". Hence, already being added there, so can safely be deleted speedily here. -- Koffieyahoo 02:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Peta 06:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per nom.AFireUponDeep 07:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 11:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rohirok 15:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --PresN 15:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete definitely not an encyclopedia article. --Tuspm ^{(C | @)} 17:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per reasons stated above. --Gray Porpoise 21:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Michael 22:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, not an encyclopedia article, already exists on Wikisource. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.