Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CFO Forum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 02:20, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] CFO Forum

Website advertising spam; not notable; makes no attempt to establish importance; should be deleted. —HorsePunchKid→龜 07:53, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as spam. Durova 08:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless someone can establish more notability, I don't think it's spam though. A meeting of influential businesspeople, that could have some notable consequences. Or not. 2 results on Google News [1] so I'm leaning towards not.

--W.marsh 08:03, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: WHOIS shows registered recently(Date registered: 04-05-2004), Google PageRank is "2". A1kmm 09:37, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep: (I am the author of the stub.) This article is not spam. I wrote the stub and included the link because the article Embedded value had a missing reference to it and I wanted to give a hint to the correct web site. CFO Forum is referred to in publications on recent developments in the insurance industry from Price Waterhouse Coopers and Towers Perrin and UK actuaries with reference to European Embedded Value. Unfortunately none of these papers contain links to the "official" CFO Forum site. This why it does not appear to be important on Google. Dbroenni 15:21, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Major European insurance companies are probably notable. Their CFOs are possibly notable. A working group of theirs is not notable merely for existing. Get yourselves an article or two in The Economist and resubmit. --William Pietri 21:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nothing of note here. Dottore So 23:59, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. *drew 01:10, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.