Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CEMMENTI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus `'Míkka 17:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CEMMENTI

CEMMENTI (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nonnotable education program. Only 200 ghits. Shalom Hello 00:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. Per WP:JNN, "simply stating that the subject of an article is not notable does not provide reasoning as to why the subject may not be notable". It is an education program supported by Canada and the European Union. Most of the relevant Ghits are to Canadian and European university web sites, plus the European Commission.[1][2][3][4][5] The article is poorly written and unsourced but that is not a reason to delete. Dbromage [Talk]Flag of Australia 01:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. But for the love of God, it needs a re-write. I have given it a bit of a clean but to be honest it needs references and all sort. Verdict: salvagable. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete fails notability per lack of coverage from verifiable third party sources. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 15:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No meaningful notability is asserted. wikipediatrix 18:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Very Keep. International project sufficiently notable for European Commission. Mukadderat 02:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep seems notable, we just have to add the sources that Dbromage provided. Ghits are not everything, this is a project from the EU, how could this be non-notable? Melsaran 12:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete of local significance only. 3 Canadian schools paired with three European ones. If it were a Canada-wide or EU wide program, then it would be notable. The refs are mostly limited to those schools, and are all of them internal. No third party references or notice, from the Canadian or European side more generally. This is lowering the bar substantially to a wide number of relatively minor exchange programs.DGG (talk) 20:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per DGG: no independent, third-party references for exchange program. Also, this article is an advertisement for the program rather than a record of the program's impact and public recognition. The topic doesn't qualify as notable. --64.181.91.112 00:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Every university has an exchange program. Who cares? 75.184.84.89 13:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.