Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CD VINYL COLLECTIBLES

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 18:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CD VINYL COLLECTIBLES

deprodded. This is an advertisement for a company with no assertions to notability that would fulfill WP:CORP or WP:WEB. In the unlikely event it is kept, it needs to be retitled to something that is not all-caps. Chaser T 09:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. I personally think the site should stay because there are little resources available via the internet, or otherwise, for music collectors who have a vested interest in Latin Pop music collectibles from the 80's, 90's, and present. Many people appreciate the site as well as the site on eBay because they end up finding music that they thought they would otherwise never find. The site offers many imports from foreign countries, which the seller visits personally to satisfy the needs of collectors. The online shop also makes a large array of promo's and out of print titles available to collectors.
  • Just change the title from CD VINYL COLLECTIBLES to CD Vinyl Collectibles. Mario 11:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, advertising. --Tim1988 talk 12:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as advertisement (WE sell...?). Emc² (CONTACT ME) 12:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete advert for a non notable company Nuttah68 14:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy "What We Sell" - "Who We Are" - Fails WP:ADS DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT THE THINGS I MESSED UP 15:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, advertising. Cites no sources. No indication whatsoever that the company is considered important. No evidence of meeting WP:CORP. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC) P. S. It is hard to believe that an important commercial enterprise would use a Geocities website. Note, too, that earlier text presented a URL that performs an eBay search for the seller, and misrepresents it as a "website," as if it were a true online store. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I've done some POV surgery on the article. Those who wish to understand the earlier comments about the promotional nature of the content should look at earlier versions such as this one. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Jaranda wat's sup 20:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong delete, blatant advertising. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Spam/advertising. --Zoz (t) 12:19, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.