Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byteusa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete - vanity. Johntex\^talk 02:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Byteusa

Contested prod, business belongs to the creator, no notability is demonstated, vanity? Delete--Peta 11:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:WEB, and there is absolutely no claim to notability. Article fails all three counts of Web. Yanksox ^(talk) 12:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Deli nk 12:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. But hope all goes well in the Navy. --Dweller 12:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I support our men and women in the Navy, but not this article. Company is not notable yet. DrunkenSmurf 17:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Yanksox.--Andeh 18:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This business does NOT belong to the creator. It is a subsidary of a CPA firm. I was just the manager.--SpyderCanopus 22:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The author of the page admits that he has affiliations with this website, and that it will be shut down as he joins the "NAVY". This will link his company with his Wikipedia info to the Navy POT POLICE. They'll see these pictures. And then they will throw him out of the Navy (so he can plan his super-villain career. Vote deletionist, foil diabolical plots.) Superbeatles 23:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC) (Paid for by Superbeatles for Deletionist Party WikiPresident Candidate of Earth)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.