Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bygfoot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 07:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bygfoot

Bygfoot (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article does not explain how the game might be notable (per WP:N guidelines), or provide any independent, reliable sources (per WP:V policy). Article tagged with these concerns in January (and was even prod'd), but tags and prod were removed without addressing these concerns. Marasmusine 08:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine 08:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - nominator says it all. /Blaxthos 15:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete without any sources to establish notability. — brighterorange (talk) 17:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Seems notable -- (Cocoaguy ここがいい _contribs^talk) 17:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
  • What is your justification for that? So far, all I see are forum posts and the official site referred to in the article. --Scottie_theNerd 14:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete nn. JJL 23:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.