The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nom withdrawn. Kurykh 06:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Poorly written article, non-notable book. —BoL 06:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep, was later recycled into the very notable Conan the Barbarian books. Was able to find this source fairly easily: [1]. Agree that the article is in poor shape, but that is not in itself a valid reason for deletion. Lankiveil (talk) 06:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC).
Comment I would like to withdraw, but, yeah, unless reliable sources can be found, I'll continue to stand. —BoL 06:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.