Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bwargh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:08, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bwargh

Neologism with ~1,000 google hits [1] (mostly forum postings), not even defined on Urban Dictionary, not used much at all and not formally defined anywhere. --W.marsh 01:29, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

• "not used much at all"? I use it m'self! But yeah, it's a non-notable neologism, and far from encyclopaedic. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef. A moderately amusing article, particularly the "bibliography" section, but probably not quite bad enough for BJAODN. — Haeleth Talk 14:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Eeyugh. A trivial spelling variation of an attempt to write a pre-verbal vocalism. Smerdis of Tlön 20:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn neo. BLARGH!  RasputinAXP  _{talk contribs} 22:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.