Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bushido DVD

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. moink 07:04, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bushido DVD

Delete just a website what rents DVDs. Alexa rank is about 1,900,000th. -Splash 22:43, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn ad. And those late fees... Karmafist 23:55, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete What more needs to be said. -- llywrch 00:03, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
• Do NOT Delete. Netflix has a page and so do many other online DVD rental websites. There is even a page dedicated to online DVD rental! What about the Technical Video Rental entry. How is that any different from this? What more needs to be said? -- unsigned comment by Mydas. -- Kjkolb 08:03, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Mindmatrix 14:21, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (?) - While this entry was likely commercially motivated and probably could be deleted, the question of when a company (of whatever type) qualifies for an article is interesting. Netflix as a large public company and the originator of a business model is a given. I created a entry for Zip.ca as the largest equivalent in the Canadian market. There are a range of smaller companies down to the Bushidos of the world - are there any general Wikipedia recommendations for cases like this? Perhaps a small company like Technical Video Rental is more deserving of an entry because of its specialty inventory than a "regular" movie rental company of the same size? I've just recently separated out the actual list of companies from Online DVD rental into a list article of their own (List of online DVD rental companies) - perhaps Bushido's mention there could be considered sufficient? David Oberst 23:57:35, 2005-09-05 (UTC)
• delete. --Image:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 00:41, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.