Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnt Face Man

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. JYolkowski // talk 21:37, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Burnt Face Man

Looks like flashcruft. ~5000 google hits hardly qualifies as an internet phenomenon. --Xcali 20:35, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• 'Delete. Not encyclopedia material. --Wetman 22:27, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertising. JamesBurns 04:43, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This has already been deleted months before. And even after that, it's as unnotable as Firth's other cartoon, Salad Fingers. Though, it's a bit rushed to call this advertising. Nestea 13:05, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Too little to be encyclopedia material, unlike the Salad Fingers article. Ghost Freeman | Talk 00:15, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• SAVE Recent edits have come up. I plead everyone to re-instate their votes. --George The Man 00:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Mine still stands. Making the article quality slightly better does not make the subject more notable. --Xcali 22:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Slightly? I'm sorry, it seemed to me that it was completely fixing this one-sentence travesty and making it into a legitimate article that was the issue. Whether an article is about a popular subject does not matter, nevermind that Burnt Face Man gets well over 1 million hits on Google. What matters is that someone took the time to put together this information, and it should be saved. See Crusading Otter for details on things not needing to be popular.George The Man 23:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Save Well, I think it is less advertisement than it was before and more encyclopedic now. Save here. Unsigned edit by TURKEY (talk · contribs)
  • Only edit by new user TURKEY outside of his/her own user page. --Xcali 22:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• If you do the search properly [1] it's only 5000 hits. Flashcruft. Delete. -- Karada 00:07, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • You don't have to have a popular article to have an article. In all honesty, Salad Fingers gets 44,000. 2 That's not too popular. And why do you have to accuse it of being "Flashcruft"(by the way, Flashcruft gets NO hits on Google, yet people here continue to use it, wherever the fuck it came from)? I fixed up the page because I liked the series and didn't want to see its Wiki destroyed because of a stupid person who put about a sentence and some links in, and called it a Wiki page. THIS, what we have now, is a Wiki page. I've already voted, but I urge you all to save it.
• Save it's more encyclopedic than a good many articles here. Kuralyov 02:22, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. .