Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burning Saviours

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 01:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Burning Saviours

Burning Saviours (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Albums released on non-notable labels (redlinked). Insufficient notability. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 11:45, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 13:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 13:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - the article fails to assert notability, the subject apparently failing the criteria of WP:MUSIC. While the article states they had a single released by a notable independent record label, this is not the two albums required by the fifth notability criterion. Googling the band to find third-party coverage yielded many hits, but didn't really seem to return much in the way of suitable material to pass the relevant criterion. Mouchoir le Souris (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Has released 3 albums on large Swedish independent labels (I Hate Records and Transubstans). They also have a single on Rise Above Records, a major doom metal/hard rock label. BeastmasterGeneral 15:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete Per criteria 5 of WP:BAND : Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels. After looking at the websites of the labels and their distributors I don't think they qualify. Beeblbrox (talk) 18:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • comment I do wonder if someone who reads Swedish could find better sources though... Beeblbrox (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.