Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burned Fur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- Drini 04:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Burned Fur

Article previously did not survive a March 2005 AFD. Was re-created in November 2005. Delete. KleenupKrew 12:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete or merge into Furry Fandom if anyone feels particularly strongly about it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete grossly POV (which can be fixed) and of no readily discernible notability (which can't). Just zis Guy you know? 13:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Burn all furries. TheMadBaron 21:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Notable enough to have an article, and the Furry Fandom page is already long enough. Beno1000 00:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per JzG. Stifle (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No comment. —Xydexx 00:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete trivial history bits from ages ago, might fail nn-group, might be merge material if I were feeling really, really generous, but I'm not. May be material for Wikifur (which AFAIK already covers this in most painful detail), but not really sufficiently interesting for inclusion in Wikipedia... we don't cover lame website "wars" either. Usenet trolls from 1980s and early 1990s may be notable, but hardly very late 1990s =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Furry fandom. Vashti 15:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per JzG -- Masterjamie 04:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.