Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete this bull. Mailer Diablo 11:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bullz

Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary. Deprodded. Weregerbil 06:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nor is it a place for things made up in school yesterday. Delete. THE KING 06:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NFT, WP:NOT. --Terence Ong 06:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Pastafarian Nights 07:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above --Scot^t 10:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and KING. Paddles 13:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or transwiki to Wiktionary--Jusjih 13:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Chicago Bulls. — RJH (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Avi 15:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Do not delete, i think it is very informative and educational. It keeps me in touch with the youth of today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.83.80.85 (talk • contribs) — The previous text was left on the AfD's talk page, I have moved it here as a courtesy and prod'd the talk page. This does not alter my own delete vote. Paddles 00:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —C.Fred (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Transwiki to Urban Dictionary. Wes! • ^T_c 01:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.