Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullion Committee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Singularity 05:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bullion Committee

Bullion Committee (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article doesn't have any sources, isn't neutral, has an elementary tone to it, and isn't very notable. I can't find any reason why this article should stay. Tavix (talk) 02:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep notable, though the article is woefully inadequate. JJL (talk) 02:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Definite keep per [1] ShivaeVolved 03:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment The article you referenced though just gives information about Sir Peel, not the Bullion Committee. The only mention was that he joined it in 1819. Tavix (talk) 22:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment from the same site: [2]. JJL (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with Sir Robert Peel as this article lacks sufficient notability & depth to have a separate page. Mh29255 (talk) 04:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Even though it's not about the big Oxo sign. Mykej (talk) 14:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per JJL; this is a really bad stub, but bad writing is a reason to fix the article, not to delete it. --Russ (talk) 19:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  • 'Keep Yes, the article is rudimentary. the solution is to improve it. DGG (talk) 17:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and hope some one will expand. The return to the bullion standard ofter the Napoleonic War was an important evetn in British monetary history and certainly ought to have an article. I cannot comment on the accuracy of the present content, but if properly expanded this article should cettainly remain. Accordingly the stub should be retained. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.