Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buck Wolf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 16:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Buck Wolf

Barely notable, violates WP:VAIN. The only author, WolfB, appears to be writing about himself. rootology 04:08, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. rootology 04:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: vanity--Musaabdulrashid 08:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Send to cleanup: Agreed that the subject is writing about himself, but the subject has a high enough profile for a (much smaller) article (incidentally, it's the publication in US Weekly, and not the occasional web and radio appearances). Removing the autobiographical element might make it passable. Geogre 14:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Send to cleanup - The nom has correctly identified vanity and a poorly written bio. However, the number of Google hits for this author and his relatively prolific writing seem to argue in favor of notability. It's probably worth keeping if it can be cleaned up and brought into compliance with policy. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 19:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Send to cleanup per the above. Aye-Aye 13:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Mallanox 19:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.