Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryce Harrington (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 04:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bryce Harrington

This article fails WP:BLP due to a lack of reliable third party sources, and in its present form reads like an over-glorified resume of sorts. Suggest deletion due to non-notability and potential vanity. Burntsauce 17:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment as there is nothing negative asserted, it does not fail BLP; as the positive information is unsourced, it does need some references. It would seem that notable things are asserted , os it would be worth a try by people who know about "Circe" and similar open-source projects. DGG (talk) 05:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• BJAODN! (Somebody had to say it.) He's the creator of the now-defunct WP:BJAODN, and according to the article, he's done some other interesting activities. I say keep as notable. Shalom ^Hello 18:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Doing something on wiki does not make you notable. Just ask Larry Sanger.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 18:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:BIO due to a lack of reliable, independent sources about the person. Being "interesting" is immaterial (WP:ILIKEIT) if the subject hasn't received any type of third party coverage. Creating the now-defunct BJAODN doesn't make you notable beyond the bounds of Wikipedia either, sorry. RFerreira 22:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and RFerreira. Requires reliable, third-party sources to assert notability, which are lacking. Xihr 02:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.