This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 03:05, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Looks like a vanity article. I'm assuming he just didn't know any better, but it still needs to be deleted. Aidje 23:30, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 08:04, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Some vanity. He admits he's a geek. Delete this "wikeeeing thing." - Lucky 6.9 07:28, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete not notable Fawcett5 04:35, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.