Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brutarian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a well written and interesting article. However, in order for the page to survive it needs to meet WP:N which leads that the subject should have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". The article is entirely devoid of secondary sources, none have been produced in an 18 day AfD and there was unanimity amongst the AfD contributors that it should be deleted. TerriersFan (talk) 00:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brutarian

Brutarian (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article about an apparently non-notable publication. No evidence of notability, and only references are to its own Myspace. Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete no evidence of notability Travellingcari (talk) 19:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Reading this article, it seems a notable subject, but since it's been tagged for so long and still doesn't have adequate references to establish notability...Beeblbrox (talk) 20:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources. Addhoc (talk) 00:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.