Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brutal Prog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 18:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brutal Prog

Brutal Prog (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Non-notable
• No sources (probably OR)
• Total of only 5 articles linked to Brutal Prog and only two band articles classifying their subject as such

Zouavman Le Zouave _{(Talk to me! • O))))} 17:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Per WP:NEO, Wikipedia should not be used to spread the word about a neologism, a recently-coined term that has not yet gone into general use. First the general use should be documented using reliable third-party sources, and then we could have an article. I also don't see the notability, and the lack of inward links from other WP articles suggests the term is not widely used. The bands listed in the article may not even use the term to describe themselves. (Evidence would be needed). EdJohnston 04:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; non-notable and unverifiable term. Prolog 10:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.