Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce h lee martial arts

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:07, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bruce h lee martial arts

I'm all for adding information on schools to Wikipedia, but this is nothing more than an advertisement.

• Delete or Rewrite so it isn't an advertisement. Acetic Acid 02:29, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't make any claim to notability. I can't imagine it's worth an encyclopedic entry. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:14, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite. Being badly written calls for improving, not removing! Trollderella 23:22, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Okay, TD, but you're telling me that a 2-bit karate academy in Illinois is notable enough for an EnWiki article? Have you gone to the official website? If we keep this article, I might as well start one for the liquor store down the street. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:33, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Good of you to volunteer to do the improvment work, Trollderella. Prod me on my talk page once you've done it and I'll reconsider my vote. -Splash 00:29, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per FernandoRizo, and with this I'm going to start using Trollderella's keep votes as starting points for deciding which articles to vote on first, since it's clear that he is engaged in performance art. Nandesuka 00:04, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not-notable. If we keep this article, I might as well start out for the liquor store down the street. --GraemeL ^(talk) 00:09, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn, ne unless and until improved.-Splash 00:29, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ad, nn. Cursive 00:52, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. --*drew 07:05, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. advertising. Xoloz 20:32, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'd have speedied it as n.n. vanity (and vaguely dishonest) advertising if I'd seen it first... Fire Star 05:21, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete spamvertisement. DoubleBlue (Talk) 16:00, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This isn't a school article, it's a business advertisement. --Carnildo 03:31, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.