Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Blausen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - ulayiti (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bruce Blausen

• Delete - Almost certainly vanity. The creator created a bunch of pages relating to Bruce Blausen in a 5 hour period last July and then disappeared. Richfife 08:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - nn, vanity, agree -- Samir ∙ ^T_C 09:02, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Arbustoo 09:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Apparently somewhat notable within his field per Google[1], but not really notable enough to be considered encyclopedic. Adrian Lamo ·· 09:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep appears to be viewed as notable in field [2] and Google search provides enough evidence to demonstrate notability as published illustrator, whatever the notability of his business may be. Monicasdude 16:40, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: The keynote speaker at that HESCA.org conference doesn't have an article - and neither does HESCA.org itself - so why would one of the early-morning warm-up acts have one? He doesn't even have a time slot to himself! —Wknight94 (talk) 17:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - He has a lot of secondary Google traffic on pages about other people ("Images provided by Bruce Blausen", etc) and he's listed in a lot of corporate directories, but I don't see much if any original work - Richfife 18:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WKnight94 --Ruby 22:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.