Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brothers in Arms (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to List of Dragonlance novels. This allows for future merging of its present contents to a parent article that might be agreed on by the consensus of editors. Some articles about this series are very well written and the contents of this article might have a hard time coming up to that standard, since it is just a plot summary. I'll let you guys sort that out, if any of you think the present content has value elsewhere. The present article doesn't meet WP:BK. The problem of the missing AfD tag shouldn't spoil this debate since it was corrected more than five days ago. EdJohnston (talk) 14:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brothers in Arms (novel)

Brothers in Arms (novel) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Plot summary. Novel fails WP:BK. Contested prod. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• Merge possible to the subseries, "Raistlin Chronicles" unless there is something already set up more suitable--I defer to the experts on how to organize this mass of material. I see in WorldCat that only 230 libraries hold this, less than 1/4 that of the most popular novels in the overall series, so i doubt if this is one of the most important of the individual works. DGG (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• Merge somewhere. The single book probably fails WP:BK but, as part of the series of books in that setting written by one of the originators information should be included somewhere. Also the article itself doesn't appear to be tagged for AfD and I'm not sure how to fix it without messing up this particular discussion. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I have attempted to insert the template manually. I can only guess that the recent website/database problems were the cause. Thanks for pointing that out. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.