Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brotherhood of Makuta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Closer's note: The consensus here is for deletion as non-notable and in-universe with no evidence of significance in reliable, secondary sources that show real world impact. The injunction tag, IMHO, does not apply as it explicitly states that the injunction is related only to television characters and episodes, not all fictional topics. This is not a television related topic. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brotherhood of Makuta

Brotherhood of Makuta (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Original research essay about a non-notable fictional group of characters. No real world context and all sources are primary. Ridernyc (talk) 05:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 11:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - per WP:FICT. Topics within a fictional universe are notable if they have received substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. The article only shows postings and links to blogs from bionicle forums which are not reliable. Dekisugi (talk) 12:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

So you think direct connections with the author is still inaccurate, eh? 71.111.145.171 (talk) 02:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. I agree that the article never establishes outside and significant coverage and as such agree it fails WP:FICT, while also failing WP:N straight-up. SorryGuy  Talk  21:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 05:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable, no real-world context. (When plausible, as per the pending ArbCom case) ♠PMC♠ 19:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep- You do know that those "unreliable blogs" are run by the man who writes the story for Bionicle? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.242.128 (talk) 08:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
    That's precisely what makes them unreliable. Doctorfluffy (talk) 08:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep- You keep this up, you might as well do away with every non-notable thing in fiction. --BS01Swert (Talk) 19:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
    It's not just fictional topics - nothing non-notable should be on Wikipedia. Also, see WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:OTHERSTUFF. Doctorfluffy (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Unlikely such sources exist. Doctorfluffy (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.