Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooks Kubick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY KEEP. This isn't the place to delete redirects. If you want, list it on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion, but RFD is exceedingly unlikely to delete this based misspelling redirect. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 07:03, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Brooks Kubick

Page created with misspelled last name; has been moved to Brooks Kubik Dsreyn 00:53, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep redir--common misspelling (over 70 hits). Redirs are cheap. Thanks for moving it, tho. :) 24.17.48.241 02:07, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable.--->Newyorktimescrossword 02:59, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
  • ...you just voted to delete a redirect as "non-notable." Please read the articles before voting. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 07:00, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Nothing to be done here, then. You want redirects for deletion. Personally, though, I don't see why it needs to go. Like 24.17.48.241 said, it's a common misspelling. Jacqui ^{★ 05:44, 8 November 2005 (UTC)}
• Redirect to Brooks Kubik with Template:R from misspelling gren グレン 06:37, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delist. This article, as Jacqui pointed out, belongs on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Further, it won't be deleted, because it's a useful redirect. Dsreyn, moving articles always results in leaving behind a redirect, and that's Almost Always a Good Thing. If someone got the name wrong when creating the article, someone else could easily get the name wrong when searching for it. Newyorktimescrossword, do you, uh, read the articles you vote to delete? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 06:59, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.